Tag Archives: Marty McFly

#3 Robert Zemeckis/ Spielberg – Back to the future (Part III)

Control your anger. It is just one letter away from ‘D’anger.

~ Unknown

Our memory is selective. For us, time is highly relative. Days, months, years tend to pass before we know it and some moments tend to linger for longer than usual. When we are one day old, the next day means 1/2 of our conscious life. When we are ten years old, the same one day means only 1/3650 of our life. That is why we tend to make more memories when we are young. We are open to experiences, which will occupy a greater space in our life and hence our memory!

If we think about it, all the three parts happen within the span of two days for the rest of the world. But for Marty it takes longer. Because whatever happens to him, is relatively more important to him than the rest of the world. For him, time moves slowly!

Marty fixes the time machine with the help of Doc Brown in 1955 and he is all set to go back to his present. Instead he goes to the old west after reading about Doc’s murder. I think both the characters switched places over here. Marty became the guide and Doc became the hero. The film unveils how Marty sculpts himself into a mature adult while Doc discovers the adolescent inside him as he falls in love!

There are moments in the film which make you recall a few incidences from the prequels, which are thoroughly enjoyable. I am sure, for the people who watched the trilogy at the time of its release, it must have been  a journey through time for them, witnessing such amazing references. The first and the third part have a lot in common, structure wise. Yet, the third part seems fresh. That is very commendable.

I loved Doc more than Marty in the film. But the most interesting character for me, is Seamus McFly. Marty’s great great grandfather. I don’t think he appears for more than 10 minutes on screen. Yet, he manages to be Marty’s guide. Telling him to control his anger. The character is played by Michael J Fox himself. And this adds a lot to the story. You see, every one of us right now want to go back in time and guide our younger selves. Michael J Fox does that! How cool…

The film ends on a very positive note. Jennifer hands over the blank paper from the future to Doc and asks him, “What does it mean?” And this is where I have my moment!

“Your future hasn’t been written yet. No one’s has. Your future is whatever you make it. So make it a good one, both of you.”

I think I have no problem in believing that Marty and Jennifer lived happily ever after without any hinderances. The lines convinced me. And I enjoyed the closure!

I feel overwhelmed at the end of the third film every time I watch the trilogy. The last film was released in 1990 and in 1991 Michael J Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. I find it poetic. I cannot imagine how hard it must have been for him. A small incident changing someone’s life, that’s what Back to the future trilogy spoke about, and that is what happened to Fox. Cinema loves poetry. The “cinemagician”, the inventor of  multiple exposures, time-lapse photography, dissolves, and hand-painted color – Georges Méliès died penniless. Superman, Christopher Reeve ended up quadriplegic. And then we have Fox! But maybe these obstacles made them transcend boundaries and become a legend.

Even after this incident Fox has given us many more moments to cherish. Homeward Bound, Spin City, Atlantis and Stuart Little!

Back to the future (Part I)

Back to the future (Part II)

Advertisements

#2 Robert Zemeckis/ Spielberg – Back to the future (Part II)

Doc: The encounter could create a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted, that’s worst-case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy.

Marty: Well, that’s a relief.

The quote is complicated enough to convey why this film took a giant dump on the first part. It is way too complicated! Or in other words, “Heavy!”

I feel it takes time for the audience to blend into the character’s boots. Unless the audience is totally convinced, that the lead character or at least one of the main character is a reflection of themselves, it is unlikely that they will care for what they do.

Jumping from intro to pitch is good in some cases. It should’ve worked in this one too, assuming that people know the first part fairly well. Over here, it was a bit too much. Had I watched this film in theaters, I feel I would’ve missed a major part of the plot as I managed to get comfortable on my seat, figuring out which hand-rest is mine. And frankly speaking I don’t have a flying DeLorean to go back in time and catch up on what I missed.

Was it necessary?

The first part is a legend. It inspired so many films in the future. The makers have also confirmed that MIB III was inspired by Back To The Future (1985). The story had it’s proper climax. The hero has sorted out his life, he kisses his girl and they celebrate a new beginning. A perfect ending! Did we need a sequel over here? Content wise? I don’t think so. But we’re into making commercial cinema, aren’t we?

Doc himself says that Time Travel is not to be used for personal benefit. Then why is he concerned about his Son going to jail in the future? Why doesn’t Doc just use the sleep inducing machine on Marty’s son in the future himself, so that he never shows up at the restaurant? Furthermore. if he really wants to help Marty, why doesn’t he just tell him to be careful while driving his truck and not to hit the Rolls Royce. Frankly speaking that caused a chain reaction. So my problem being, ‘was it necessary?’

The film lacks a good obstacle. I understand that getting back the Almanac is the major obstacle, but come on; they have the time machine, fully functioning! Plus, there are two of them right now. If one person messes it up the the other can go to the same point in time and guide him like Morpheus guides Neo in The Matrix.

And there are several other points in the story which I am not to convinced with. But I do not want the analysis to be entirely a rant. So…

The film has several good references to the pop culture. My favourite being, the mockery of Spielberg’s own film Jaws. Remember, “Sharks never looked real”? It serves as a good base for the much better third part, giving a much more logical explanation for Marty being Clint Eastwood in the Old West. The film ends by showing what happens in the third part. Which suggests that the makers planned and shot both the parts simultaneously. So when we talk of the second part, we need to consider the trilogy as a whole. In that manner, the film does not have an end only the introduction to the last part!

Note: The best foreshadowing ever –

Doc:  Better that I devote myself to study the other great mystery of the universe: women!

To be concluded!